In the quiet woods of Idaho, what was meant to be a routine response to a forest fire turned into a deadly ambush, claiming the lives of two firefighters and leaving a third critically wounded. The legacy media quickly painted a picture of a lone gunman, single-handedly igniting the fire to lure and attack first responders. However, the layers of this event suggest a narrative far more complex and possibly orchestrated.
When tragedy strikes, it's our duty to dig deeper and question the presented narrative, so join me for a deep dive to uncover the layers of inconsistencies in this one.
Was this tragedy a planned act meant to sway public opinion or enact new policies, particularly around gun control and civil liberties?
Share this post